In my finally post, precisely nigh 4 weeks ago, I valued Tesla, together with equally alongside all of my Tesla valuations, I got feedback, much of it heated. My valuation of Tesla was $186, inwards what I termed my base of operations case, together with in that location were many who disputed that value, from both directions. There were some who felt that I was beingness also pessimistic inwards my assessments of Tesla's increment potential, but in that location were many to a greater extent than who argued that I was beingness also optimistic. In either case, I receive got no wishing to convert you lot to my betoken of view, since the essence of valuation is disagreement. In the context of some of these critiques, in that location was give-and-take of how my valuation incorporated (or did non incorporate) the expected dilution from time to come part issuances together with what part count to occupation inwards computing value per share. Since these are broader issues that recur across companies, I decided to dedicate a post service alone to these questions.
Share Count together with Value Per Share
There was a time, non so long ago, when getting from the value of equity for a companionship to value per part was a picayune exercise, involving dividing the aggregate value past times the number of shares outstanding.
Value per part = Aggregate Value of Equity/ Number of Shares outstanding
This computation tin give the axe larn problematic when you lot receive got i or to a greater extent than of the next phenomena:
- Expected Dilution: As immature companies together with start-ups larn listed on world marketplace places, investors are increasingly beingness called upon to value companies that volition involve to access upper-case alphabetic lineament markets inwards time to come years, to encompass reinvestment together with operating needs. To the extent that some or all of this novel upper-case alphabetic lineament volition come upwards from novel part issuances, the part count at these companies tin give the axe live expected to climb over time. The enquiry for analysts together with so becomes whether, together with if yes, how, to conform the value per part today for these additional shares.
- Share based compensation: When employees together with managers are compensated alongside shares or options, in that location are 3 issues that comport on valuation. The offset is whether the expense associated alongside stock based compensation should live added dorsum to brand it at cash flows, since it is a non-cash expense. The instant is how to conform the value per part today for the restricted shares together with options that receive got already been granted to managers. Third, if a companionship is expected to piece of work on alongside its policy of using stock based compensation, you lot receive got to determine how to conform the value per part today for time to come grants of options or shares.
- Shares alongside unlike rights (voting together with dividend): When companies number shares alongside unlike voting rights or dividends, they are inwards effect creating shares that tin give the axe receive got unlike per-share values. If a companionship has voting together with non-voting shares, together with you lot believe that voting shares receive got to a greater extent than value than non-voting shares, you lot cannot split upwards the aggregate value of equity past times the number of shares outstanding to larn to value per share.
Note that piece none of these developments are new, analysts inwards world markets dealt alongside them infrequently a few decades ago, together with could, inwards fact, larn away alongside using curt cuts or ignoring them. Today, they receive got larn to a greater extent than pervasive, together with the old evasions no longer volition stand upwards you lot inwards skilful stead.
Expected Dilution
The Change: An investor or analyst dealing alongside publicly traded companies inwards the 1980s by together with large valued to a greater extent than mature companies, since going world was considered an choice only for those companies that had reached a phase inwards their life cycle, where profits were positive (or close) together with continued access to upper-case alphabetic lineament markets was non a prerequisite for survival. Young companies together with start-ups tended to live funded past times venture capitalists, who priced these companies, rather than valued them. In the 1990s, alongside the point com boom, nosotros saw the modify inwards earth listing paradigm, alongside many immature companies listing themselves on world markets, based upon hope together with potential, rather than profits or established job organisation models. Even though the point com bubble is a distant memory, that pattern of listing early on has continued, together with in that location are far to a greater extent than immature companies listed inwards markets today. An investor who avoids these companies precisely because they do non gibe old metrics or models is probable to honor large segments of the marketplace to live out of his or her reach.
The Consequence: If you lot are valuing a immature companionship alongside increment potential, you lot volition by together with large honor yourself facing ii realities. The offset is that many immature companies lose money, equally they focus their attending on edifice businesses together with acquiring clientele. The instant is that increment requires reinvestment, inwards flora together with equipment, if you lot are a manufacturing company, or inwards technology scientific discipline together with R&D, if you lot are a technology scientific discipline company. As a consequence, inwards a discounted cash flow valuation, you lot tin give the axe await to regard negative expected cash flows, at to the lowest degree for the offset few years of your forecast period. To live on these years together with brand it to positive earnings together with cash flows, the companionship volition receive got to elevate fresh capital, together with given its lack of earnings, that upper-case alphabetic lineament volition by together with large accept the shape of novel equity, i.e., expected dilution, which, inwards turn, volition comport on value per share.
The Right Response: If you lot are doing a discounted cash flow valuation, the right reply to the expected dilution is to do nothing. That may audio also skilful to live true, but it is true, together with hither is why. The aggregate value of equity that you lot compute today includes the acquaint value of expected cash flows, including the negative cash flows inwards the upwards front end years. The latter volition bring down the acquaint value (value of operating assets), together with that reduction captures the dilution effect. You tin give the axe split upwards the value of equity past times the number of part outstanding today, together with you lot volition receive got already incorporated dilution.
I know that it sounds similar a reach, but allow me occupation my base of operations instance Tesla valuation to illustrate. In the tabular array below, I receive got my expected cashflows for the side past times side 10 years, alongside the terminal value inwards yr 10.
 |
| Download Tesla Valuation and Dilution Spreadsheet |
The acquaint value of the expected cash flows across all 10 years is $41,333 million, together with netting out debt together with adding dorsum cash, yields an equity value of $33,124 million; the value per part is $189.23. However, this value includes the acquaint value of expected cash flows from years 1 through 8, which are negative inwards my forecast,s together with receive got a acquaint value of $16,157 million. If these cash flows had non been considered, the value of the operating assets would receive got been $57,490 meg together with the value of equity would receive got been $48,282 million, a value per part of $284.41. In effect, nosotros receive got applied a 33.46% discount to value, for time to come dilution.
Implicitly, I am assuming that the theatre volition fund 88.06% of its upper-case alphabetic lineament needs alongside equity, consistent alongside the debt ratio that I assumed inwards the DCF, together with that the shares volition live issued at the intrinsic value per part (estimated inwards the valuation), alongside that value per part increasing over fourth dimension at the cost of equity. That may strike some equally unrealistic, but it is the selection that is most consistent alongside an intrinsic valuation. If Tesla is able to number shares at a higher cost (than its intrinsic value), nosotros volition receive got nether estimated the value per share, together with if it has to number shares at a cost lower than its intrinsic value, nosotros volition receive got over estimated value. There is i finally reality check. While nosotros receive got implicitly assumed that Tesla volition receive got access to upper-case alphabetic lineament markets together with live able to elevate capital, in that location is a run a risk that upper-case alphabetic lineament markets could unopen downwardly or larn inaccessible to the firm. That risk is non inwards the discounted cash flow valuation together with has to live brought inwards explicitly inwards the shape of a run a risk of failure. In my base of operations instance valuation, it is i of the reasons that I attached a run a risk of failure (albeit a minor i of 5%) to the company.
A Viable Alternative: There is an alternative approach, where you lot forecast the number of shares that volition live issued inwards time to come years to encompass the negative cashflows, together with count them equally shares outstanding today. If you lot occupation this approach, you lot should laid the cash flows for the negative cash flow years to live zero. The risk inwards this approach is that in that location is a circularity that tin give the axe campaign your valuations to larn unstable, since you lot volition involve to forecast a cost per part inwards time to come years to larn an gauge of value per part today. To illustrate this process, assume that you lot believe that the issuance cost for Tesla for the novel shares volition live $200, alongside a cost appreciation of 9% a yr for the side past times side 8 years. The tabular array below computes the novel shares that volition involve to live issued each year, assuming that 88.06% of upper-case alphabetic lineament comes from equity, together with the dilution that volition resultant equally a consequence:
 |
| Download dilution spreadsheet |
Note that, alongside the assumptions nigh the issuance cost of $200, Tesla volition number 69.35 meg shares over the side past times side viii years. Adding that to the electrical flow part count of 169.76 meg shares yields total shares outstanding of 236.85 meg shares. If you lot laid the cash flows inwards years 1-8 to null together with compute the value of equity, you lot brand it at a value of equity of $48,282 million, which tin give the axe live divided past times the 239.11 meg shares to brand it at a value per part of $201.92. This is slightly higher than the value that I obtained inwards the cash flow approach, but it is partly because I receive got assumed an issuance cost that is higher than the intrinsic value.
But Never Do This: Reviewing the ii approaches, you lot tin give the axe either contain the acquaint value of the negative cash flows into the value of operating assets today together with occupation the electrical flow part count, inwards estimating value per share, or you lot tin give the axe seek to forecast expected time to come part issuances together with split upwards the acquaint value of only positive cash flows past times the enhanced part count to larn to value per share. You cannot do both, because you lot are together with so reducing value per part twice for the same phenomenon, i time past times discounting the negative cash flows together with including them inwards value together with and so i time to a greater extent than past times increasing the part count for the shares issued to encompass those negative cash flows.
Share Based Compensation (SBC)
The Cause: Over history, businesses receive got used equity to compensate employees, either to align incentives or because they lack the cash to pay competitive wages. That said, the occupation of part based compensation exploded inwards the 1990s due to ii reasons. The offset was an ill-conceived endeavor past times the US Congress to position a cap on management compensation, piece non counting options granted equally purpose of that compensation. Not surprisingly, many firms shifted to using options inwards compensation packages. The instant was the point com boom, where you lot had hundreds of immature companies that had heaven high valuations but no earnings or cash flows; these companies used options to attract together with maintain employees. Aiding together with abetting these firm, inwards this procedure were the accountants, who chose non to care for these choice grants equally expensed at the fourth dimension they were granted, together with thus allowed companies to study much higher income than they were real earning.
The Consequence: As companies shifted to part based compensation, in that location were ii side effects that analysts had to bargain with, when valuing them. The offset was the drag on per-share value created past times past choice together with part grants to employees, alongside options, inwards particular, creating trouble, since they could create dilution, if part prices went up, but could live worthless, if part prices dropped. The instant was the enquiry of how to element inwards expected choice together with part grants inwards the future, since the value of these grants would live affected past times expected time to come part prices. As alongside the dilution question, analysts faced a round down reasoning problem, where to value a part today, you lot had to brand forecasts of the value per part inwards time to come years.
The Right Response: To bargain alongside part based compensation correctly, you lot receive got to interruption it downwardly into ii parts:
1. Past choice together with part grants: If you lot ain shares inwards a company, the shares together with options granted past times the theatre inwards prior years to employees stand upwards for claims on the equity, that reduces your value per share. The shares issued inwards the past times are uncomplicated to bargain with, since adding them to the part count volition bring down the value per part today. The fact that employees receive got to vest (which requires staying alongside the theatre for a specified fourth dimension period) together with that the shares receive got restrictions on trading tin give the axe brand them less valuable than unrestricted shares, but that is a relatively minor problem. The options that receive got been granted inwards the past times are a bigger challenge, since they stand upwards for potential dilution, but only if the part cost rises inwards a higher house the exercise price. Option pricing models are designed to capture the probabilities of this happening together with tin give the axe live used to value options, no thing how inwards or out of the coin the options are. In an intrinsic valuation, you lot should value these options offset (using an choice pricing model) together with cyberspace the value out of the estimated value of equity, earlier dividing past times the existing part count :
- SBC Adjusted Value per part = (DCF Value of Equity - Value of Employee Options)/ Share count today including restricted shares
Note that the shares that volition live created if the options larn exercised should non live included inwards part count, inwards this approach, since that would live double counting.
2. Expected time to come grants: To the extent that a companionship is expected to piece of work on to compensate its employees alongside options or restricted shares inwards time to come years, the most logical agency to bargain alongside these grants is to care for them equally expenses inwards time to come years, together with bring down expected income together with cash flows. Rather than larn by alongside expected time to come part prices, you lot should gauge the expenses (associated alongside SBC) equally a per centum of revenues, together with occupation that forecast equally the footing for expenses inwards the future. Until accounting came to its senses inwards 2004 and required companies to expense part based compensation at the fourth dimension of grant, this was an onerous exercise for analysts, since it required estimating the value of choice together with part grants inwards past times years to larn historical numbers on the value of SBC grants. With the prevalent accounting rules inwards both GAAP together with IFRS, the earnings that you lot regard for companies should already live adjusted for SBC expenses together with reported income should so give you lot a fair footing for forecasting. (The operating together with cyberspace margins that I study past times sector, on my website, are margins afterwards stock based compensation expenses). At offset sight, it may appear similar double counting to lower time to come earnings because you lot await choice together with part grants inwards the future, together with and so i time to a greater extent than lower the value of equity that you lot obtain past times the value of options that are already outstanding. It is not, since nosotros are dealing alongside ii separate issues. H5N1 companionship that has had a history of stock based compensation, but has decided to suspend using SBC inwards the future, volition live affected past times only the instant adjustment, whereas a companionship that has never used part based compensation inwards the past times but plans to occupation it inwards the future, volition live affected only past times the former. H5N1 companionship that has part based compensation inwards its past times together with expects to occupation it inwards the time to come volition live affected past times both adjustments.
Tesla uses stock based compensation, together with its most recent annual together with quarterly statements supply a mensurate of the magnitude.
 |
| Tesla 10K for 2017 and Tesla 10Q, First Quarter 2018 |
The compensation tin give the axe accept the shape of restricted stock or options, together with the annual filing provides the cumulative effect of this part based activity. At the goal of 2017, according to Tesla's 10K, the company had 10.88 meg options outstanding, alongside a weighted average exercise cost of $105.56 together with a weighted average maturity of 5.30 years together with 4.69 meg restricted shares. The restricted shares are already included inwards the part count of 169.76 meg shares, but the options involve to live accounted for. We value the options, using a modified version of the Black-Scholes model, to brand it at a value of $2,927 million. Netting this value out of the value of equity that nosotros obtained from the cash flows allows us to larn to a corrected value per share:
 |
| Download Tesla valuation |
The value per share, afterwards adjusting for options, is $171.99. There is an elephant inwards the room inwards the shape of a gigantic grant of 20.26 meg shares to Elon Musk, alongside the issuance contingent on coming together operating milestones (revenues together with adjusted EBITDA) together with marketplace milestones (market capitalization). The complexity of the vesting schedule on this grant makes it hard to value using choice pricing models, but the effect of this looming grant is to lower value per part today together with hither is why. If Tesla succeeds inwards growing revenues together with turning to profitability, these choice grants volition vest, creating large expenses inwards the yr inwards which that occurs together with putting downward pressure level on margins. In making my forecasts of time to come margins for Tesla, I receive got been to a greater extent than conservative at to the lowest degree inwards the early on years, only for this reason.
A Sloppy Alternative: There is an alternative approach to bargain alongside options outstanding from past times grants. They value options at their exercise value, i.e., the departure betwixt the stock cost together with strike cost today, together with ignore out of the coin options. This is called the treasury stock approach together with the value of equity per part inwards this approach tin give the axe live written equally follows:
Treasury Stock Value per part = (DCF value of equity + Exercise Price * # Options outstanding) / (Share Count today + Options Outstanding)
By ignoring the fourth dimension premium on options, this approach volition over value shares today together with past times ignoring out of the coin options, you lot exacerbate the problem. In the instance of Tesla, using the exercise stock approach would yield the next value per share:
Treasury Stock Value per part (Tesla) = ($32,124 + $105.56 * 10.88) / (169.76 + 10.88) = $184.19
The analysts who occupation this approach often justify it past times disputation that choice pricing models tin give the axe yield noisy estimates, but fifty-fifty the worst choice pricing model volition outperform i that assumes that options merchandise at exercise value.
And Nonsensical Practices: There are ii woefully bad practices, when it comes to stock based compensation, that should live avoided. The offset is to precisely conform the part count for options outstanding together with brand no other changes. In this "fully diluted" approach, you lot are counting inwards the dilution that volition arise from choice exercise but ignoring the cash that volition come upwards into the theatre from the exercise.
- Fully Diluted Value per part = DCF value of equity / (Share Count today + Options Outstanding)
With Tesla, for instance, this approach would yield the following:
- Fully Diluted Value per part (Tesla) = $32,124/ (169.76 + 10.88) = $177.83
This approach volition yield also depression a value per share, together with peculiarly so if you lot count out of the coin options equally good inwards the denominator. The instant together with fifty-fifty to a greater extent than indefensible do is to add together dorsum part based compensation to earnings to larn to adjusted earnings. The rationale that is offered for doing so is that part based compensation is a non-cash expense, a unsafe bending of logic, since it allows companies to occupation in-kind payments (shares, services) to evade the cash flow test. Using this logic, Tesla would add together dorsum the $141.6 meg they had inwards share-based compensation expenses to their income inwards the offset quarter of 2018 together with study lower losses. Carried into time to come forecasts, this volition inflate time to come earnings together with cash flows, pushing upwards estimated value. Since these ii bad practices force value away from fair value inwards unlike directions, the only logic for their continued occupation is that, inwards combination, the mistakes volition magically offset each other. Good luck alongside that!
Shares alongside unlike rights
The Cause: Founders together with families who accept their companies world receive got ever wanted to receive got their cake together with consume it too, together with i agency inwards which they receive got been able to do so is past times creating unlike part classes, normally built unopen to voting rights. The founder/family handgrip on to the higher voting right shares together with thus maintain command of the company, piece selling off large shares of equity to the public, together with cashing out. In the United States, shares alongside unlike voting rights were rare for much of the finally century, primarily because the New York Stock Exchange, which was the preferred listing house for companies, did non allow them. Again, the tech nail of the 1990s changed the game, past times making the NASDAQ, which had no restrictions on shares alongside unlike voting rights, an alternative destination, peculiarly for large technology scientific discipline companies. The floodgates on shares alongside unlike voting rights opened upwards alongside the Google listing inwards 2004, together with the Google model, alongside shares alongside unlike voting rights, has larn the default model for many of the tech companies that receive got gone world inwards the finally decade.
The Consequence: When you lot receive got unlike classes of shares, alongside unlike voting rights, you lot receive got ii effects on value. The offset is a corporate governance effect, since changing management becomes much to a greater extent than difficult, together with that tin give the axe comport on how you lot value together with thought badly managed firms. The instant is a unit of measurement problem, since a voting right part together with a non-voting right part stand upwards for unlike equity claims together with cannot live treated equally having the same value. Thus, you lot tin give the axe no longer split upwards the aggregate value of equity past times the total number of shares outstanding.
The Right Response: When valuing firms alongside unlike voting rights, you lot receive got to bargain alongside it inwards ii steps. When valuing the firm, you lot receive got to contain the fact that changing management is going to live to a greater extent than hard to do inwards your estimates. Thus, if you lot theatre borrows no coin (even though it tin give the axe lower its cost of upper-case alphabetic lineament past times moving to an optimal or target debt ratio fo 40%), you lot should leave of absence the debt ratio at null rather than modify it. This volition lower the value that you lot gauge for the operating assets together with equity inwards the firm. Once you lot receive got the value of equity, you lot volition receive got to brand a judgment on how much of a premium you lot would await the voting shares to merchandise at, relative to non-voting shares, inwards i of ii ways. In the first, you lot tin give the axe facial expression at studies of voting shares inwards publicly traded companies inwards the US together with Europe, which honor a premium of betwixt 5-10% for voting shares, together with occupation that premium equally your base of operations number. In the second, you lot tin give the axe occupation an approach that uses intrinsic valuation models to gauge the premium, which I force inwards my newspaper on valuing control. Once you lot receive got the estimate, you lot tin give the axe occupation algebra to consummate your gauge of value per share.
Value per non-voting part = Aggregate Value of Equity/ (# Non-Voting Shares + (1+ Voting Share Premium) # Voting Shares)
For example, if the value of equity is $210 million, in that location are 50 meg non-voting shares together with 50 meg voting shares together with the voting part premium is 10%, your value per non-voting part volition be:
Value per non-voting part = 210/ (50+ 1.1*50) = $2.00/share
Value per voting part = $2.00 (1.10) = $2.20/share
The Bottom Line
I know that some of you lot volition thought this post service equally nit-picking, but you lot volition live surprised at how much of an effect on value you lot tin give the axe receive got past times non beingness careful nigh part count. Those of you lot who occupation multiples (PE, EV/EBITDA) may live secretly happy that you lot don't receive got to bargain alongside the issues of part count, since you lot don't do discounted cash flow valuations. Unfortunately, that is non true. Dilution, part based compensation together with shares alongside unlike rights are precisely equally much an number when you lot compare multiples across companies, together with ignoring them or using curt cuts (like total dilution) volition only skew your comparisons together with atomic number 82 to mis-pricing stocks. I would advise 4 full general rules:
- Aggregate versus Per-share numbers: Given how dilution together with options tin give the axe play havoc alongside part count, it is ameliorate to occupation aggregate than to occupation per part numbers, inwards valuation together with inwards pricing. Thus, to obtain PE, split upwards the marketplace capitalization of the companionship past times its total cyberspace income, rather than cost per part past times earnings per share.
- When SBC is rampant, command for differences: If the occupation of restricted stockand options vary widely across sector, you lot involve to command for those differences when comparing pricing inwards the sector. If you lot do not, companies that receive got large choice overhangs volition facial expression cheap, relative to those that do not.
- Don't occupation SBC adjusted earnings: Adjusting earnings together with EBITDA, past times adding dorsum stock based compensation, is an abomination, used past times desperate companies together with analysts to present you lot that they are making money, when they are non fifty-fifty close. Don't autumn for the sleight of hand.
- With frontward multiples, banking company check on together with command for dilution: Analysts, when valuing immature companies, often split upwards today’s marketplace capitalization or enterprise value past times expected revenues or EBITDA inwards the future. The dilution that volition live needed to larn to time to come EBITDA has to live brought into the equation.
Spreadsheets
Blog Posts on Tesla
