January 2019 Information Update 3: Playing The Numbers Game!

Every year, for the finally iii decades, I convey spent the commencement calendar week of the year, looking at numbers. Specifically, equally the calendar twelvemonth ends, I download raw information on private companies as well as endeavor to decipher trends as well as patterns inwards the data. Over the years, the raw information has conk to a greater extent than easily accessible as well as richer, but ironically, I convey conk to a greater extent than wary virtually trusting the numbers. In this post, I volition describe, inwards broad terms, what the information for 2019 looks like, inwards terms of geography as well as industry, as well as pass the side yesteryear side few posts eking out equally much information equally I tin terminate out of them.

The Data: Geography

My sample includes all publicly traded firms amongst a marketplace capitalization greater than null as well as all of the information that I larn from my information providers is inwards Earth domain. Put differently, for an private firm, you lot should survive able to extract all of the information that I convey for the firms inwards my sample, as well as compute the statistics as well as ratios that I do, if you lot are as well as so inclined. If you lot are wondering why I don't enshroud out firms that convey pocket-size marketplace capitalizations or are inwards markets where information disclosure is spotty, it is because whatsoever sampling choices that I brand to bound my sample volition create biases that may skew the statistics.

For my 2019 information update, I convey 43,846 firms inwards my sample. While these companies are incorporated inwards 148 countries, I class them broadly into v geographical groups:

Geographical Grouping	Includes	Rationale
Australia, NZ as well as Canada	Australia, New Zealand as well as Canada	Share a reliance on natural resources.
Developed Europe	EU, UK, Switzerland as well as Scandinavia	Includes riskier European Union countries, but reflects European fellowship pricing as well as choices.
Emerging Markets	Asia other than Japan, Africa, Middle East, Latin America, Eastern Europe & Russia	Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 actually mixed pocketbook of countries from many regions amongst unlike characteristics, amongst variations inwards added risk.
Japan	Japanese companies	Different plenty from the remainder of the basis that it even as well as so deserves its ain grouping.
United States	US companies	Accounts for the biggest chunk of basis marketplace capitalization.

I volition confess upward front end that at that spot is an chemical cistron of arbitrariness to this classification, but no classification volition always survive immune to that subjectivity.  The breakdown of my sample both inwards terms of numbers of firms as well as marketplace capitalization is below:

US firms are even as well as so the leaders inwards the marketplace capitalization race, accounting for 38% of overall marketplace value. While emerging marketplace firms delineate of piece of job concern human relationship for roughly one-half the firms inwards my overall sample, their marketplace capitalization is 30% of the overall global marketplace capitalization. The emerging marketplace grouping includes firms from 4 continents, listed inwards countries that attain inwards jeopardy from depression jeopardy to extraordinarily high risk. The ii biggest emerging markets, inwards terms of listings as well as marketplace capitalization, are Bharat as well as Cathay as well as I volition interruption out companies listed inwards those countries separately for computing my numbers.

The Data: Industry Groupings

To class companies into industrial groups, I start amongst the manufacture listings provided yesteryear my raw information providers but add together my ain twist to create manufacture groupings. One argue that I exercise as well as so is to honor my raw information providers' proprietary classifications as well as the other is to compare across time, since I convey classified firms amongst my groupings for decades. In making my classifications, I volition err on the side of broader classifications, rather than narrower one, for ii reasons:

1. Law of large numbers: The might of averaging gets stronger, equally sample sizes increase, as well as using broader groupings results inwards larger samples. To illustrate, I convey 1148 wearing clothing firms inwards my global sample, thence allowing for plenty firms inwards every sub grouping. 
2. Better measures: In both valuation as well as corporate finance, at that spot is an declaration to survive made that the numbers nosotros obtain for broader groups is a amend guess of where companies volition converge than focusing on smaller groups. 

That said, at that spot volition survive times where the broad manufacture classifications that I exercise volition frustrate you, peculiarly on pricing metrics, similar PE ratios as well as EV to EBITDA multiples. I study the manufacture average PE ratios as well as EV to EBITDA multiples for specialty retailers collectively, but if you lot are valuing a luxury retailer, you lot would convey liked to reckon these averages reported exactly for luxury retailers. I apologize inwards advance for that, but the consolation toll is that if you lot desire to compute an average across a pocket-size sample of companies exactly similar yours, the information to exercise as well as so is available online as well as oftentimes for free. 

In sum, I interruption companies downward into 94 industries as well as you lot tin terminate reckon the numbers of firms as well as marketplace capitalizations of each manufacture inwards this file. The x biggest industries, at the start of 2019, based upon the number of publicly traded firms as well as marketplace capitalization are reported below:

Download total listing of industries

While I used to furnish fellowship grade information until 2015, my raw information providers convey pose restrictions on that as well as I tin terminate no longer exercise that. If you lot are interested inwards finding out which manufacture grouping a specific fellowship that you lot are interested inwards belongs to, you lot tin terminate detect out yesteryear downloading this file. Finally, I dissever fiscal service firms from the remainder of the sample inwards computing my market-wide statistics, but because they are as well as so unlike that including them volition skew the numbers. You tin terminate reckon for yourself how much of a difference this makes.

The Data: Statistics

Timing
I download information from both accounting statements as well as fiscal markets as well as inwards doing so, I exercise run across a mild timing issue. The accounting information that I convey for most firms on Jan 1, 2019, is equally of the tertiary quarter of 2018 (ending September 30, 2018) as well as I exercise the trailing 12-month information equally of the most recent fiscal filing. For companies inwards countries amongst semi-annual filings, the information volition survive fifty-fifty mow dated, but at that spot is niggling that tin terminate survive done virtually that. For marketplace data, I exercise the marketplace prices as well as rates, equally of Dec 31, 2018. While you lot may mean value of that equally a timing inconsistency, I exercise not, since that is most updated information an investor would convey had on Jan 1, 2019.

Adjustments
With the accounting information, I exercise my discretion to modify accounting rules that I believe non solely brand no feel but skew our perspectives on companies. The commencement adjustment that I brand is to convert lease commitments to debt, which alters operating income as well as debt numbers, a modification that I convey made for to a greater extent than than xx years. I am pleased to authorities notation that accounting volition finally come upward to its senses as well as endeavor to exercise the same starting inwards 2019 as well as you lot should survive able to larn a preview of how margins, debt ratios as well as returns on upper-case missive of the alphabet volition modify from my computations. The instant adjustment is to convert R&D expenses from an operating expense (which it clearly is not) to a upper-case missive of the alphabet expense, which it clearly is, i time to a greater extent than affecting operating income as well as invested capital. For purposes of transparency, I study both the adjusted as well as the unadjusted numbers for the statistics that are affected yesteryear it.

Statistics as well as Ratios
Since my interests prevarication inwards corporate finance, valuation as well as investment management, I compute a broad attain of statistics, equally tin terminate survive seen inwards the tabular array below (reproduced from finally year). :

Risk Measures	Cost of Funding	Pricing Multiples
1.     Beta	1.     Cost of Equity	1.     PE &PEG
2.     Standard departure inwards stock price	2.     Cost of Debt	2.     Price to Book
3.     Standard departure inwards operating income	3.     Cost of Capital	3.     EV/EBIT, EV/EBITDA as well as EV/EBITDA
4.     High-Low Price Risk Measure		4.     EV/Sales as well as Price/Sales
Profitability	Financial Leverage	Cash Flow Add-ons
1.     Net Profit Margin	1.     D/E ratio & Debt/Capital (book & market) (with lease effect)	1.     Cap Ex & Net Cap Ex
2.     Operating Margin	2.     Debt/EBITDA	2.     Non-cash Working Capital equally % of Revenue
3.     EBITDA, EBIT as well as EBITDAR&D Margins	3.     Interest Coverage Ratios	3.     Sales/Invested Capital
Returns	Dividend Policy	Risk Premiums
1.     Return on Equity	1.     Dividend Payout & Yield	1.     Equity Risk Premiums (by country)
2.     Return on Capital	2.     Dividends/FCFE & (Dividends + Buybacks)/ FCFE	2.     US equity returns (historical)
3.     ROE - Cost of Equity
4.     ROIC - Cost of Capital

You tin terminate click on the links to reckon the US information for the start of 2019, inwards html, but I would strongly recommend that you lot download the information inwards Excel from my information page. You volition non solely larn information that is easier to function amongst but you lot tin terminate equally good download the information for the global sample as well as geographical groups (as good equally Bharat as well as China).

The Data: Use

It would survive presumptuous of me to tell you lot how to exercise data, since that is a personal choice, but having worked amongst this information for almost xxx years, I tin terminate offering you lot some caveats:

1. Don't assume that hateful reversion is automatic: Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 corking bargain of valuation as well as investment administration is built on the presumption that hateful reversion volition occur. Thus, depression PE stocks volition deliver high returns, equally the PE converges on the average for the sector. While hateful reversion is a rigid force, it is non immutable, as well as when you lot convey structural changes inwards the economic scheme as well as sectors, it volition interruption down. 
2. Trust, but verify: While I would similar to believe that my computations of widely used ratios (from accounting ratios similar render on equity as well as ROIC to pricing metrics similar EV to EBITDA) are correct, they correspond my views as well as may differ from yours. It is for this argue that I furnish a total listing of how I compute my numbers at this link. If you lot exercise detect a statistic that I study that you lot are non clear about, as well as you lot cannot detect the description of how I computed it, delight allow me know.
3. The information volition age, as well as some to a greater extent than speedily than others, over the course of teaching of the year: I convey neither the interest, nor the inclination, to survive a full-fledged information service. So, delight don't facial expression daily, weekly or monthly updates of the data. In fact, God willing, the information volition survive updated a twelvemonth on Jan 5, 2020. The solely numbers that I invention to update mid twelvemonth are the terra firma jeopardy premiums.

I promise that you lot detect my information useful inwards whatever you lot pursue, as well as if you lot exercise exercise it, you lot are welcome to it. I detect that sharing information that I volition require as well as exercise anyway costs me nothing, as well as the solely affair that I volition inquire of you lot is that you lot transcend on the sharing.  

YouTube Video

Data links

1. Sample breakdown- Industry Groups
2. Company lookup
3. Current Data page on my website

January 2019 Data Updates

1. Data Update 1: Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 Reminder that equities are risky, inwards example you lot forgot!
2. Data Update 2: The Message from Bond Markets
3. Data Update 3: Playing the Numbers Game
4. Data Update 4: The Many Faces of Risk
5. Data Update 5: Of Hurdle Rates as well as Funding Costs!
6. Data Update 6: Profitability as well as Value Creation!
7. Data Update 7: Debt, neither toxicant nor nectar!
8. Data Update 8: Dividends as well as Buybacks - Fact as well as Fiction!
9. Data Update 9: Playing the Pricing Game!

January 2019 Information Update 1: A Reminder That Equities Are Risky, Inwards Instance You Lot Forgot!

In bull markets, investors, both professional person together with amateur, often pay lip service to the notion of risk, but blithely ignore its relevance inward both property allotment together with stock selection, convinced that every dip inward stock prices is a buying opportunity, together with soothed past times bromides that stocks ever win inward the long term. It is thence healthy, albeit painful, to hold upward reminded that the direct chances inward stocks is real, together with that at that spot is a ground why investors earn a premium for investing inward equities, equally opposed to safer investments, together with that is the message that markets to a greater extent than or less the Blue Planet delivered inward the in conclusion quarter of 2018.

A Look Back at 2018

The stock marketplace started 2018 on a roll, having posted nine consecutive upward years, making the crisis of 2008 seem similar a distant memory. True to form, stocks rose inward January, led past times the FAANG (Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix together with Google) stocks together with momentum investors celebrated. The laid out wake upward telephone telephone of the twelvemonth came inward February, laid out equally the marketplace responded negatively to macroeconomic reports of higher inflation, together with so equally Facebook together with Google stumbled from self-inflicted wounds. 

The marketplace shook off its tech blues past times the halt of March together with continued to ascent through the summer, amongst the S&P 500 peaking for the twelvemonth at 2931 on September 20, 2018.   For the many investors who were already counting their winnings for the year, the in conclusion quarter of 2018 was a shock, equally volatility returned to the marketplace amongst a vengeance. In October, the S&P 500 dropped past times 6.94%, though it felt far worse because of the day-to-day together with intraday cost swings. In November, the S&P 500 was flat, but volatility continued unabated. In December, the States equities finally succumbed to selling pressures, equally a sudden selloff pushed stocks closed to the "bear market" threshold, before recovering a piddling towards the halt of the year.  

Over the course of pedagogy of the year, every major the States equity index took a hit, but the variation across the indices was modest.

The ranking of returns, amongst the S&P 600 together with the NASDAQ doing worse than the Dow or the SD&P 500 is what you lot would await inward whatever downwards market. With dividends incorporated, the provide on the S&P 500 was -4.23%, the laid out downwards marketplace inward a decade, but solely a modestly bad twelvemonth past times historical standards:

I know that this is little consolation, if you lot lost coin in conclusion year, but looking at annual returns on stocks inward the in conclusion xc years, at that spot receive got been 20 years amongst to a greater extent than negative returns. In short, it was a bad twelvemonth for stocks, but it felt far worse for iii reasons. First, subsequently nine proficient years for the market, investors were lulled into a fake feel of complacency almost the capacity of stocks to hold delivering positive returns. Second,  the negative returns were all inward the in conclusion quarter of the year, making the hitting seem larger (from the highs of September 2018) together with to a greater extent than immediate. Third,  the intraday together with day-to-day volatility exacerbated the fearfulness factor, together with those investors who reacted past times trading faced far larger losses.

The Equity Risk Premium

If you lot receive got been a reader of this blog, you lot know that my favorite device for disentangling the mysteries of the marketplace is the implied equity direct chances premium, an gauge of the cost that investors are demanding for the direct chances of investing inward equities. I dorsum this release out from the electrical flow marketplace prices together with expected hereafter cash flows, an IRR for equities that is analogous to the yield to maturity on a bond:

As amongst whatever mensurate of the market, it requires estimates for the hereafter (expected cash flows together with growth rates), but it is non solely frontwards looking together with dynamic (changing equally the marketplace moves), but also surprisingly robust together with comprehensive inward its coverage of fundamentals. 

At the laid out of 2018, I estimated the equity direct chances premium, using the index at that dot inward fourth dimension (2673.61), the 10-year treasury bond charge per unit of measurement on that twenty-four hr menses (2.41%) together with the growth charge per unit of measurement that analysts were projecting for turn a profit for the index (7.05%). 

The equity direct chances premium on Jan 1, 2018 was 5.08%. As nosotros moved through the year, I computed the equity direct chances premium at the laid out of each month, adjusting cash flows on a quarterly footing (which is almost equally often equally S&P does it) together with using the index grade together with ten-year T.Bond charge per unit of measurement at the laid out of each month:

While the conventional wisdom almost equity direct chances premiums is the they create non alter much on a twenty-four hr menses to twenty-four hr menses footing inward developed markets, that has non been truthful since 2008. In 2018, at that spot were 2 periods, the laid out calendar week of Feb together with the calendar month of October, where volatility peaked on an intraday basis, together with I computed the ERP past times day, during the laid out calendar week of February, together with all through October:

During October, for instance, the equity direct chances premium moved from 5.38% at the laid out of the calendar month to 5.76% past times the halt of the month, amongst broad swings during the course of pedagogy of the month.

After a roughshod December, where stocks dropped to a greater extent than than 9% partly on the recognition that global economical growth may slacken faster than expected, I recomputed the equity direct chances premium at the laid out of 2019:

The equity direct chances premium has increased to 5.96%, but a closer facial expression at the differences betwixt the inputs at the laid out together with halt of the twelvemonth indicates how investor perspectives receive got shifted over the course of pedagogy of the year:

Going into 2019, investors are clearly less upbeat than they were inward 2018 almost hereafter growth together with to a greater extent than worried almost hereafter crises, but companies are continuing to provide cash at a footstep that exceeds expectations.

What now?

I know that you lot are looking for a bottom business hither on whether the numbers are aligned for a proficient or a bad twelvemonth for stocks, together with I volition disappoint you lot upward front end past times admitting that I am a terrible marketplace timer. As an intrinsic value investor, the solely market-related enquiry that I inquire is whether I discovery the electrical flow cost of direct chances (the implied ERP) to hold upward an acceptable one; if it is besides depression for my tastes, I would shift away from stocks, together with if it is besides high, shift to a greater extent than into them. To gain perspective, I graphed the implied ERP from 1960 through 2018 below:

At its electrical flow grade of 5.96%, the equity direct chances premium is inward the top decile of historical numbers, exceeded solely past times the equity direct chances premiums inward iii other years, 1979, 2009 together with 2011. Viewed purely on that basis, the equity marketplace is to a greater extent than nether valued than over valued right now.

I am fully aware of the dangers that lurk together with how they could apace alter my assessment together with they tin demo upward inward i or to a greater extent than of the inputs:

1. Recession together with lower growth: While at that spot was almost no utter almost a possible recession either globally or inward the US, at the laid out of 2018, some analysts, albeit a minority, are raising the possibility that the economic scheme would ho-hum downwards plenty to force it into recession, at the laid out of 2019. While the lower turn a profit growth used inward the 2019 computation already incorporates some of this worry, a recession would brand fifty-fifty the lower release optimistic. In the tabular array below, I receive got estimated the lawsuit on the equity direct chances premium of lower growth, together with  note that fifty-fifty amongst a compounded growth charge per unit of measurement of -3% a twelvemonth for the adjacent 5 years, the ERP stays inward a higher house the historical average of 4.19%.
   
2. Higher involvement rates: The fearfulness of the Fed has roiled markets for much of the in conclusion decade, together with piece it has played out equally higher brusk term involvement rates for the in conclusion 2 years, the ten-year bond rate, subsequently a surge over 3% inward 2018, is at i time dorsum to 2.68%. There is the possibility that higher inflation together with economical growth charge per unit of measurement tin force this release higher, but it is hard to run into how this would hap if recession fears pan out. In fact, equally I noted in this postal service from before inward the year, higher involvement rates, if the trigger is higher existent growth (and non higher inflation), could hold upward a positive for stocks, non a negative.
3. Pullback on cash flows: the States companies receive got been returning huge amounts of cash inward the shape of stock buybacks together with dividends. In 2018, for instance, dividends together with buybacks amounted to 92% of aggregate earnings, higher than the 84.60% paid out, on average, betwixt 2009 together with 2018, but even so lower than the numbers inward excess of 100% posted inward 2015 together with 2016. Assuming that the payout volition conform over fourth dimension to 85.07%, reflecting expected long term growth, lowers the ERP to 5.55%, even so good inward a higher house historical levels.
4. Political together with Economic Crises: The merchandise nation of war together with the Brexit mess volition play out this twelvemonth together with each has the potential to scare markets plenty to justify the higher ERP that nosotros are observing. In addition, it goes without maxim that at that spot volition hold upward at to the lowest degree a crisis or 2 that are non on the radar right at i time that volition hitting markets, an unwanted side lawsuit of globalization. 

Looking at how the equity direct chances premium volition hold upward affected past times each of these variables, I mean value that the marketplace has priced inward already for shocks on at to the lowest degree 2 of these variables, inward the shape of lower growth together with political/economic crises, together with tin withstand fairly pregnant bad word on the other two. 

Bottom Line

I receive got long argued that it is meliorate to hold upward transparently incorrect than opaquely right, when making investment forecasts. In keeping amongst my ain advice, I believe that stocks are to a greater extent than probable to become upward inward 2019, than down, given the information that I receive got now. That said, if I am wrong, it volition hold upward because I receive got nether estimated how much economical growth volition ho-hum inward the coming twelvemonth together with the magnitude of economical crises. Odds are that I volition run into the tell tale signs besides slow to protect myself fully against whatever resulting marketplace corrections, but that is non my game anyway. 

YouTube Video

Datasets

1. Historical Returns on Stocks, Bonds together with Bills - 1928 to 2018
2. Historical Implied Equity Risk Premiums for the States - 1960 to 2018

Spreadsheets

1. Implied ERP for Jan 1, 2019

January 2019 Data Updates

1. Data Update 1: H5N1 Reminder that equities are risky, inward example you lot forgot!
2. Data Update 2: The Message from Bond Markets
3. Data Update 3: Playing the Numbers Game
4. Data Update 4: The Many Faces of Risk
5. Data Update 5: Of Hurdle Rates together with Funding Costs!
6. Data Update 6: Profitability together with Value Creation!
7. Data Update 7: Debt, neither poisonous substance nor nectar!
8. Data Update 8: Dividends together with Buybacks - Fact together with Fiction!
9. Data Update 9: Playing the Pricing Game!

January 2019 Information Update 9: The Pricing Game

In my in conclusion 8 posts, I looked at aspects of corporate deportment from investments to financing to dividend policy, using the information that I collected at the get of 2019, to examine what companies percentage inward common, in addition to what makes them different. In summary, I works life that the ascent inward lead chances premiums inward both equity in addition to bond markets inward 2018 receive got pushed upwards costs of equity in addition to capital, that companies across the globe are finding it hard to generate returns on their investments that top their costs of funding, in addition to that many of them, specially inward mature businesses, are returning to a greater extent than cash, much of it inward the cast of buybacks. Since all of the companies inward my information laid are publicly traded, at that topographic point is ane in conclusion let on that I receive got non addressed straight inward my posts then far, in addition to that is the marketplace seat pricing of these companies. In this post, I  complete my information update series, past times looking at how pricing varies across companies, sectors in addition to geographies, in addition to what lessons investors tin draw from the data.

Value versus Price: The Difference

I receive got posted many times on the betwixt the value of an property in addition to its' pricing, but I don't intend it hurts to revisit that difference. The determinants of value are simple, although non ever piece of cake to estimate. Whether you lot are valuing start-up businesses, emerging marketplace seat firms, or commodity companies, the values are driven past times expected cash flows, growth, in addition to risk. Although a discounted cash menses valuation is frequently the tool that nosotros used to give cast to these fundamentals, inward the cast of cash flows, increase rates inward these cash flows, in addition to discount rates, it is non the only pathway to intrinsic value.  The determinants of toll are demand in addition to supply, in addition to acre fundamentals do behave upon both, mood in addition to momentum are also rigid forces inward pricing. These “animal spirits,” equally behavioral economists mightiness tag them, tin non only drive toll to diverge from value, but also require different tools to last used to assess the right pricing for an asset. With many assets in addition to businesses, pricing an property commonly involves standardizing a toll (a multiple), finding similar or comparable assets that are already priced inward the marketplace, in addition to controlling for differences. The movie below, which I receive got used many times before, captures the ii processes:

The ground that I reuse this movie then much is because, to me, it is an all-encompassing snapshot of every conceivable investment philosophy that exists inward the market:

1. Efficient Marketers: If you lot believe that markets are efficient, the ii processes volition generate the same number, in addition to whatever gap that exists volition last purely random in addition to chop-chop closed.
2. Investors: If you lot are an investor, whether value or growth, in addition to you lot genuinely hateful it, your persuasion is that the pricing process, for ane ground or the other, tin deliver a toll different from your gauge of value in addition to that the gap that exists volition close, equally the toll converges to value. The deviation betwixt value in addition to increase investors lies inward where you lot intend markets are most probable to brand mistakes (in valuing existing assets or increase opportunities) in addition to right them. In essence, you lot are equally much a believer inward efficient markets equally the outset group, amongst the only deviation beingness that you lot believe markets dice efficient afterward you lot receive got taken your seat on a stock. 
3. Traders: If you lot are a trader, you lot get off amongst either the presumption that at that topographic point is no such matter equally intrinsic value, or that it exists, but that no ane tin gauge it. You play the pricing game, effectively using your skills at gauging momentum in addition to forecasting the effects of corporate tidings on prices, to purchase at a depression toll in addition to sell at a high price.

Market participants are most exposed to danger when they are delusional most the game that they are playing. Many portfolio managers, for instance, claim to last investors, playing the value game, acre using pricing screens (PE in addition to growth, PBV in addition to ROE) in addition to adding to their holdings of momentum stocks. Many traders seem to intend that they volition last viewed equally deeper in addition to to a greater extent than accomplished if they speak the value talk, acre using charts in addition to technical indicators inward the closet, to brand their stock picks.

The Pricing Process

The essence of pricing is attaching a let on to an property or company, based upon how similar assets in addition to companies are beingness priced inward the market. To acquire insight into how to toll an asset, a concern or a company, you lot should intermission downwards the pricing procedure into steps:

You may last a lilliputian puzzled past times the outset pace inward the process, where I standardize the price, but the ground is simple. You cannot compare toll per percentage across companies, since it is a business office of the percentage count, which tin last changed overnight inward a stock split. To standardize prices, you lot scale them to some variable that all of the assets inward the peer grouping share. With existent estate properties, you lot separate the toll of each holding past times its foursquare footage to brand it at a price/square human foot that tin last compared across properties. With businesses, you lot scale pricing to an operating variable, amongst profits beingness the most obvious choice, but it tin last revenues, cash flows or majority value. Note that whatever multiple that you lot uncovering on a stock or society is embedded inward this definition, ranging from PE ratios to EV/EBITDA multiples to revenue multiples, in addition to fifty-fifty beyond, to marketplace seat toll per subscriber or user. The 2nd pace inward the process, i.e., finding similar assets in addition to companies, should brand clear the fact that this is a procedure that requires subjective judgments in addition to is opened upwards to bias, precisely equally is the illustration inward intrinsic valuation. If you lot are pricing Nvidia, for instance, you lot create upwards one's heed how narrowly or broadly you lot define the peer group, in addition to which companies to deem to last "similar".  The tertiary pace int he procedure requires controlling for differences across companies. Put simply, if the society that you lot are pricing has higher increase or lower lead chances or meliorate returns on its investments on it projects that the companies inward the peer group, you lot receive got to arrange the pricing to reverberate it, either subjectively, equally many analysts do, amongst story telling, or objectively, past times bringing inward key variables into the estimation process.

Pricing the Markets inward Jan 2019

Rather than taking you lot through multiple afterward multiple, in addition to overwhelming amongst pictures in addition to tables on each one, I volition listing out what I learned past times looking at the pricing of all publicly traded stocks around the world, inward early on 2019, inward a serial of pricing propositions.

Pricing Proposition 1: Absolute rules don't belong inward a relative world!

Paraphrasing Einstein, everything is relative, if you lot are pricing companies. Is a PE ratio of 5 low? Not if one-half the stocks inward the marketplace seat merchandise at less than five. Is an EV/EBITDA of 40 high? Perhaps inward some sectors, but non if you lot are comparing high increase companies inward a highly priced sector. Old fourth dimension value investing is filled amongst rules of thumb, in addition to many of these rules are devised around absolute values for PE or PEG ratios or Price to Book, at odds amongst the real notion of pricing. If you lot desire to brand pricing statements most what comprises inexpensive or expensive, you lot should last looking at the distribution of the multiple across the market. Thus, to cast pricing rules on US stocks at the get of 2019, I looked the distribution of current, forrard in addition to trailing PE ratios for US stocks on Jan 1, 2019:

At the get of 2019, a depression trailing PE ratio for a US stock would receive got been 6.09, if you lot used the lowest decile or 10.36, if you lot moved to the outset quartile, in addition to a high PE ratio, using the same approach, would receive got been 27.31, amongst the tertiary quartile, or 53.70, amongst the top decile. Lest I last defendant of picking on value investors, they are non the only or fifty-fifty the biggest culprits, when it comes to absolute rules. Private equity investors in addition to LBO initiators receive got built their ain laid of screens. I receive got lost count of the let on of times I receive got heard it said that an EV to EBITDA less than half dozen (or 5 or seven) must hateful that a society is non precisely cheap, but a skillful candidate for leverage, but is that true? To answer the question, I looked at the EV to EBITDA multiples across companies, across regions of the world.

If you lot wield a pricing bludgeon in addition to declare all companies that merchandise at less than half dozen times EBITDA to last cheap, you lot volition uncovering most one-half of all stocks inward Russian Federation to last bargains. Even globally, you lot should hav no problem finding investments to brand amongst this rule, since almost ane quarter of all companies merchandise at less than half dozen times EBITDA.  My indicate is non that that you lot cannot receive got rules of thumb, since they do be for a reason, but that those rules, inward a pricing world, receive got to last scaled to the data. Thus, if you lot desire to define the outset decile equally your mensurate of what comprises cheap, why non brand it the outset decile? That would hateful that an EV to EBITDA multiple less than 5.16 would last inexpensive inward the US on Jan 1, 2019, but that let on would receive got to recalibrated equally the marketplace seat moves upwards or down.

Pricing Proposition 2: Markets receive got a cracking deal inward common, when it comes to pricing, but the differences tin last revealing!

Much is made most the differences across global equity markets, in addition to specially most the separate betwixt emerging in addition to developed marketplace seat companies, when it comes to pricing, amongst delusions running deep on both sides. Emerging marketplace seat analysts are convinced that stocks are priced real differently, in addition to frequently to a greater extent than irrationally, inward their local markets, leaving them gratis to devise their ain rules for their markets. Conversely, developed marketplace seat analysts frequently convey perspectives most what comprises high, depression or average pricing ratios, built upwards through decades of exposure to US in addition to European markets, to emerging markets in addition to uncovering them puzzling. The information tells a different story, amongst pricing ratios around the basis having distributional characteristics that are surprisingly similar across different parts of the world:

While the levels of PE ratios vary across regions, amongst Chinese stocks having the highest median PE ratios (20.63) in addition to Russian in addition to East European stocks the lowest (9.40), they all receive got the same asymmetric look, amongst a peak to the left (since PE ratios cannot last lower than zero) in addition to a tail to the right (there is no cap on PE ratios). That asymmetry, which is shared past times all pricing multiples, is the ground that you lot should ever last cautious most whatever pricing declaration that is built on comparisons to the average PE or PBV, since those numbers volition last skewed upwards because of the asymmetry.  While it is truthful that markets percentage mutual characteristics, when it comes to pricing, the differences inward levels are also worth paying attending to, when investing. Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 global fund managing director who ignores these differences, in addition to picks stocks based upon PE ratios alone, volition terminate upwards amongst a portfolio that is dominated past times African, Midde East in addition to Russian stocks, non a recipe for investing success.

Pricing Proposition 3: Book value is the most overrated metric inward investing

I receive got never understood the reverence that some investors seem to concur for majority value, equally revealed inward the let on of investing adages built around it. Stocks that merchandise at less than majority value are considered cheap, in addition to companies that construct upwards majority value are considered to last value creating. At the root of the "book value" focus are ii assumptions, sometimes stated but frequently implicit. The outset is that the majority value is a mensurate of liquidation value, an gauge of what investors would acquire if they closed downwards the society today in addition to sold its assets. The 2nd is that accountants are consistent in addition to conservative inward estimating property value, dissimilar markets, which are prone to mood swings. Both assumptions are built on foundations of sand, since majority value is non a skillful mensurate of liquidation value inward most sectors, in addition to accountants are both inconsistent in addition to slow-moving, when it comes to estimating in addition to adjusting majority value. Again, to acquire perspective, let's aspect at the toll to majority ratios around the world, at the get of 2019:

If you lot believe that stocks that merchandise at less than majority value are cheap, you lot volition ane time again uncovering lots of bargains inward the Middle East, Africa in addition to Russia, but fifty-fifty inward markets similar the United States, where less than a quarter of all companies merchandise at less than majority value, they tend to last clustered inward industries that are inward upper-case missive of the alphabet intensive (at to the lowest degree equally defined past times accountants) in addition to declining businesses.

PBV past times Industry (US)

Note that amidst the US industries amongst the fewest stocks that merchandise at less than majority value are a large let on of technology in addition to consumer production companies, amongst utilities in addition to basic chemicals beingness the only surprises. On the listing of US manufacture groups amongst the highest per centum of stocks that merchandise at less than majority value are crude oil companies (at different stages of the business), one-time fourth dimension manufacturing companies in addition to life insurance. If you lot pick your stocks based upon depression toll to book, inward Jan 2019, your portfolio volition last weighted amongst companies inward the latter group, a prospect that should concern you.

Pricing Proposition 4: Most stocks that aspect inexpensive deserve to last cheap!

There are traders who receive got lilliputian fourth dimension for fundamentals, argument that they receive got lilliputian or no job to play inward twenty-four hours to twenty-four hours movements of stock prices. That is in all likelihood true, but fundamentals do receive got pregnant explanatory power, when it comes to why some companies merchandise at depression multiples of profits or majority value in addition to others are high multiples. To empathize the link, I uncovering it most useful to dice dorsum to a elementary intrinsic value model, in addition to amongst elementary algebraic manipulation, brand it a model for a pricing multiple. The movie below shows the paths you lot would accept amongst an equity multiple (Price to Book) in addition to an enterprise value (EV/Sales) to brand it at their determinants:

Now what? If you lot purchase into the intrinsic persuasion of a toll to majority ratio, it should last higher for firms that earn high returns on equity, receive got higher increase in addition to lower risk, in addition to lower for firms that earn depression returns on equity, receive got lower increase in addition to higher risk. Does the marketplace seat toll inward fundamentals? For the most part, the answer is yes, equally you lot tin come across fifty-fifty inward the tables that I receive got provided inward this post service then far. Russian stocks receive got the lowest PE ratios, but that reflects the corporate governance concerns in addition to province lead chances that investors receive got when investing inward them. Chinese stocks inward contrast receive got the highest PE ratios, because fifty-fifty amongst stepped downwards increase prospects for the country, they receive got higher expected increase than most developed marketplace seat companies. Looking at stocks amongst the lowest toll to majority ratios, Middle Eastern stocks receive got a disproportionate representation because they earn depression returns on equity in addition to the manufacture groupings amongst the lowest toll to majority (oil manufacture groups, steel etc.) also percentage that feature. Pricing, done right, is thence a search for mismatches, i.e., companies that aspect inexpensive on a pricing multiple without an obvious key that explains it. This tabular array captures some of the mismatches:

Multiple	Key Driver	Valuation Mismatch
PE ratio	Expected growth	Low PE stock amongst high expected increase charge per unit of measurement inward profits per share
PBV ratio	ROE	Low PBV stock amongst high ROE
EV/EBITDA	Reinvestment rate	Low EV/EBITDA stock amongst depression reinvestment needs
EV/capital	Return on capital	Low EV/capital stock amongst high render on capital
EV/sales	After-tax operating margin	Low EV/sales ratio amongst a high after-tax operating margin

Pricing Proposition 5: In pricing, it is non most what "should be" priced in, but "what is" priced in!

In the in conclusion proposition, I argued that markets for the most portion are sensible, pricing inward fundamentals when pricing stocks, but at that topographic point volition last exceptions, in addition to sometimes large ones, where entire sectors are priced on variables that receive got lilliputian to do amongst fundamentals, at to the lowest degree on the surface. This is specially truthful if the companies inward a sector are early on inward their life cycles in addition to receive got lilliputian to present inward revenues, real lilliputian (or fifty-fifty negative) majority value in addition to are losing coin on every profits measure. Desperation drives investors to aspect for other variables to explicate prices, resulting inward companies beingness priced based upon website visitors (at the peak of the point com boom), numbers of users (at the get of the social media craze) in addition to numbers of subscribers.

I noted this phenomenon, when I priced Twitter ahead of its IPO inward 2013, in addition to argued that to toll Twitter, you lot should aspect at its user base of operations (about 240 ane one one thousand thousand at the time) in addition to what markets were paying per user at the fourth dimension (about $130) to brand it at a pricing of $24 billion, good to a higher house my gauge of intrinsic value of $11 billion for the society at a time, but much closer to the actual pricing, right afterward the IPO.  It is thence neither surprising nor newsworthy that venture capitalists in addition to equity enquiry analysts are to a greater extent than focused on these pricing metrics, when assessing how much to pay for stocks, in addition to companies, knowing this, play along, past times emphasizing them inward their profits reports in addition to tidings releases.

Conclusion

I do believe inward intrinsic value, in addition to intend of myself to a greater extent than equally an investor than a trader, but I am non a valuation snob. I chose the path I did because it works for me in addition to reflects my beliefs, but it would last both arrogant in addition to incorrect for me to scrap that beingness a trader in addition to playing the pricing game is somehow less worthy of honor or returns. In fact, the terminate game for both investors in addition to traders is to brand money, in addition to if you lot tin brand coin past times screening stocks using PE ratios or technical indicators, in addition to timing your entry/exit past times looking at charts, all the to a greater extent than powerfulness to you! If at that topographic point is a indicate to this post, it is that a cracking deal of pricing, equally practiced today, is sloppy in addition to ignores, or throws away, information that tin last used to brand pricing better.

YouTube Video

Data Links

1. PE ratios past times manufacture grouping: US, Europe, Emerging Markets, Japan, Australia & Canada, India and China
2. Book Value Multiples past times manufacture grouping: US, Europe, Emerging Markets, Japan, Australia & Canada, India and China
3. EV to EBIT & EBITDA past times manufacture grouping: US, Europe, Emerging Markets, Japan, Australia & Canada, India and China
4. EV to Sales past times manufacture grouping: US, Europe, Emerging Markets, Japan, Australia & Canada, India and China
5. Pricing Multiples, past times country

January 2019 Data Updates

1. Data Update 1: Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 Reminder that equities are risky, inward illustration you lot forgot!
2. Data Update 2: The Message from Bond Markets
3. Data Update 3: Playing the Numbers Game
4. Data Update 4: The Many Faces of Risk
5. Data Update 5: Of Hurdle Rates in addition to Funding Costs!
6. Data Update 6: Profitability in addition to Value Creation!
7. Data Update 7: Debt, neither toxicant nor nectar!
8. Data Update 8: Dividends in addition to Buybacks - Fact in addition to Fiction!
9. Data Update 9: Playing the Pricing Game!

January 2019 Information Update 2: The Message From Bond Markets!

I must acknowledge that I don't pay every bit much attending to fixed income markets, every bit I do to equity markets, other than to role numbers from the markets every bit inputs when I value companies or facial expression at equity markets. This year, I decided to facial expression at bond marketplace position movements, both inward the sovereign bond in addition to corporate bond markets for ii reasons. First, bond markets offering predictive information nearly futurity economical growth in addition to inflation, in addition to since ane of the big uncertainties for equities going into the novel twelvemonth is whether the economic scheme could become into recession, it is worth paying attending to what bond investors are telling us. Second, ane of the stories inward the equity marketplace position during 2018 was that the cost of risk, inward the cast of an equity risk premium, rose in addition to became to a greater extent than volatile, in addition to it makes feel to facial expression at whether the cost of risk inward the bond market, taking the cast of default spreads, also exhibited the same characteristics. Bear inward mind, though, that the bond marketplace position is non my natural habitat in addition to if y'all are a fixed income trader or an involvement charge per unit of measurement prognosticator or fifty-fifty a Fed Watcher, y'all may uncovering my reasoning to move simplistic in addition to maybe fifty-fifty wrong.

The US Treasury Market

The house to commencement whatever assessment of involvement rates is the US treasury market, amongst it hit of offerings, both inward terms of maturity (from 1 calendar month to thirty year) in addition to cast (nominal in addition to real). When valuing equities on an intrinsic value basis, it is the long term US treasury that is your chance cost (since your cash flows on equity are also long term inward intrinsic value) in addition to the ten-year US treasury bond charge per unit of measurement is my input. (The 30-year US treasury may genuinely move meliorate suited to equities, from a maturity perspective, but has less reliable history, to a greater extent than illiquid in addition to dependent area to behaving inward foreign ways). The path of the US 10-year T. Bond on a daily terra firma is captured inward the graph below:

At the commencement of the year, I had argued that at that topographic point was a practiced run a risk that the 10-year T. Bond would striking 3.5% over the course of study of the year, but after reaching 3.24% on Nov 8, the charge per unit of measurement dropped dorsum inward the terminal quarter, to terminate the twelvemonth at 2.69%.  

Returns on T. Bonds in addition to Historical Premiums

If y'all bought ten-year treasury bonds on Jan 1, 2018, the rising inward the T.Bond charge per unit of measurement translated into a cost drib of 2.43%, effectively wiping out the coupon y'all would accept earned in addition to resulting inward a render for the twelvemonth of -0.02%. The consolation cost is that y'all would accept nevertheless done meliorate than investing inward US stocks over the twelvemonth in addition to generating a render of -4.23%. Updating the historical numbers for the United States, hither is the updated score on what US stocks accept earned, relative to T.Bonds in addition to T.Bills over time:

Download historical annual returns

There is no denying that historically stocks accept delivered higher returns that treasuries, but every bit nosotros saw inward the terminal quarter this year, it is compensation for the risk that y'all face. 

The Yield Curve Flattens

The big story over the course of study of the twelvemonth was the flattening of the yield curve, amongst brusk term rates rising over the course of study of the year; the 3-month T.Bill charge per unit of measurement rose from 1.44% on Jan 1, 2018 to 2.45%on Dec 31, 2018 in addition to the 2-year US treasury bond charge per unit of measurement rose from 1.92% on Jan 1, 2018 to 2.42% on Dec 31, 2018. The yield bend flattening is shown inward the graph below:

By December, a part of the yield bend inverted, amongst 5-year rates dropping below 2-year in addition to 3-year rates, leading to a alluvion of stories nearly inverted yield curves predicting recessions. I did postal service on this inquiry a few weeks ago, in addition to spell I volition non rehash my arguments, I noted that the gradient of the yield bend in addition to economical growth are solely loosely connected.

The TIPs Rate in addition to Inflation

Finally, I  looked at the charge per unit of measurement on the inflation protected 10-year US treasury bond over the course of study of the year, inward relation to the US 10-year bond. 

Note that the divergence betwixt these 10-year T.Bond charge per unit of measurement in addition to the 10-year TIPs charge per unit of measurement is a marketplace position mensurate of expected inflation over the adjacent 10 years. Over the course of study of 2018, the "expected inflation" charge per unit of measurement has stayed inside a fairly tight bound, ranging from a depression of 1.70% to a high of 2.18%. In fact, if the render on inflation was on investor minds, the memo seems to accept non reached this business office of the bond market, amongst expected inflation decreasing over the course of study of the year.

What now?

At the commencement of terminal year, when investors were expecting much stronger growth inward the economic scheme in addition to had only seen a drib inward corporate revenue enhancement rates, the debate was nearly how much the US treasury bond charge per unit of measurement would climb over the course of study of 2018. As nosotros saw inward the department above, the 10-year US treasury bond charge per unit of measurement did rise, but solely moderately so, maybe because at that topographic point was a dampening of optimism nearly futurity growth inward the terminal quarter. That said, the Federal Reserve in addition to its chair, Jerome Powell, are nevertheless the focus of attending for unopen to investors, obsessed amongst what the primal depository fiscal establishment volition or volition non do adjacent year.  

Intrinsic Riskfree Rates

As unopen to of y'all accept read this spider web log know well, I am skeptical nearly how much might the Fed has to displace involvement rates, peculiarly at the long terminate of the spectrum, in addition to the economy. To teach perspective on the grade in addition to direction of long term involvement rates, I uncovering it to a greater extent than useful to build what I telephone proper name upward an intrinsic risk gratis charge per unit of measurement past times adding together the inflation charge per unit of measurement in addition to existent gross domestic product growth charge per unit of measurement each year. The figure below provides the long term comparing of the actual treasury bond charge per unit of measurement in addition to the intrinsic version of it:

Download raw data

There are ii versions of the intrinsic risk gratis charge per unit of measurement that I report, ane using only the electrical current year;'s inflation in addition to existent growth in addition to ane using a ten-year average of inflation in addition to existent gross domestic product growth, which I volition termed the smoothed intrinsic risk gratis rate. This graph explains the top dog reasons why involvement rates dropped after 2008, really depression inflation in addition to anemic growth. As growth in addition to inflation accept picked upward inward the terminal ii years, the treasury bond charge per unit of measurement has stayed stubbornly low, in addition to for those who blame the Fed for almost everything that happens, this was a catamenia during which the Fed was raising the Fed Funds rate, the solely involvement charge per unit of measurement it direct controls, in addition to scaling dorsum on quantitative easing. At the terminate of 2018, the treasury bond charge per unit of measurement (2.68%) lagged the contemporaneous intrinsic risk gratis charge per unit of measurement (5.54%) past times 2.86% in addition to the smoothed charge per unit of measurement (3.58%) past times 0.90%.

Reading the Tea Leaves

What does this all mean? I am no bond marketplace position soothsayer, but I meet ii possible explanations. One is that the bond marketplace position is correct in addition to that expected growth inward the adjacent few years volition drib dramatically. The other is that bond marketplace position investors are beingness much every bit good pessimistic nearly futurity growth, in addition to that rates volition rising every bit the realization hits them.  I believe that the truth falls inward the middle. Nominal growth inward the US economic scheme volition drib off from its 2018 levels, but non to the levels imputed past times the bond marketplace position today, in addition to treasury bond rates volition rising to reverberate that reality. In the absence of a crystal ball, I volition jeopardy a approximate that the US 10-year treasury bond charge per unit of measurement volition rising to 3.5%, the smoothed out intrinsic rate, past times the terminate of the year, in addition to that gross domestic product growth volition drib past times a per centum (in nominal in addition to existent terms) from 2018 levels. As amongst all my macroeconomics predictions, this comes amongst a  money dorsum guarantee, which explains why I do this for free.

The US Corporate Bond Market

If the regime bond charge per unit of measurement offers signals nearly futurity inflation in addition to expected growth inward the economy, the corporate bond marketplace position sends its ain messages nearly the economy, in addition to specifically nearly risk in addition to its price. In particular, the spread betwixt a US $ corporate bond in addition to the US Treasury bond of equivalent maturity is the cost of risk inward the bond market. To meet how this mensurate moved over the course of study of the year, I looked at the yields on a Aaa. Baa in addition to Can 10-year corporate bonds (Moody's) relative to the US 10-year treasury  bond over the course of study of the year:

As amongst the equity risk premium, default spreads widened over the course of study of the twelvemonth for all bond ratings classes, but to a greater extent than in addition to hence for the lower ratings. Also, like to the designing inward equity markets, all of the widening inward the equity risk premium happened inward the terminal quarter of 2018. In fact, the intraday volatility of default spreads increased inward October, mirroring what was happening inward the equity market. In a afterward update, I volition move looking at province risk, using sovereign default spreads every bit ane mensurate of that risk. These default spreads also widened inward 2018, setting the phase for higher province risk premiums. All inward all, 2018 saw the cost of risk become upward inward both the equity in addition to debt markets, in addition to non surprisingly, companies volition meet higher costs of uppercase every bit a consequence.

Bottom Line

For the most part, the bond in addition to stock markets were singing from the same vocal majority this year. Both markets started the year, expecting continued line inward the economy, but both became less upbeat nearly economical prospects towards the terminate of the year. For stock markets, this translated into expectations of lower net turn a profit growth in addition to stock prices, in addition to for bond markets, its showed upward every bit lower treasury bond rates in addition to higher default spreads. Investors inward both markets became to a greater extent than wary nearly risk in addition to demanded higher prices for taking risk, amongst higher equity risk premiums inward the stock marketplace position in addition to higher default spreads inward the bond market. 

YouTube Video

Datasets

1. Historical Returns on Stocks, T. Bonds in addition to T.Bills - 1928 to 2018
2. T. Bond Rates, Inflation in addition to Real Growth - 1953 to 2018
3. Corporate Bond Default Spreads - Start of 2019

January 2019 Data Updates

1. Data Update 1: H5N1 Reminder that equities are risky, inward illustration y'all forgot!
2. Data Update 2: The Message from Bond Markets
3. Data Update 3: Playing the Numbers Game
4. Data Update 4: The Many Faces of Risk
5. Data Update 5: Of Hurdle Rates in addition to Funding Costs!
6. Data Update 6: Profitability in addition to Value Creation!
7. Data Update 7: Debt, neither toxicant nor nectar!
8. Data Update 8: Dividends in addition to Buybacks - Fact in addition to Fiction!
9. Data Update 9: Playing the Pricing Game!